Denny v. C. L. Fain Co.

Under the circumstances of this case I do not think that it was necessary to introduce the plaintiff in error’s executions in evidence. They' were executions .based on the foreclosure of bills of sale and retention-of-title contracts. The rule filed by Cherry Transfer & Storage Company, Par. 4, alleged: “This movant further shows that the following . cases, together with the plaintiff have claims against the defendant: . . Mrs. Ed. Spicer Denny . . Case No. *482203806, 203805.” The marshal answered the rule alleging that the sums remaining in his hands after court costs and storage were…