Legal Opinion
Mann v. Payne
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided May 29, 1926PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBraley, J.
The action is in contract to recover damages for breach of an agreement in which the plaintiff is described as Wilham Mann and Company. It is in these words.
"Buyer
William Mann & Co.
88 Broad St., Boston, Mass.
Contract No. 1090 Date April 13th, 1921.
As Brokers we have this day consummated the following transactions between the given parties.
Seller Franco American Union of New England, Box 41 Washington Square, Worcester.
Buyer Messrs. Wm. Mann & Company, 88 Broad St., Boston, Mass.
Merchandise Bordeau Walnut Halvés.
Quality 1920 crop — Mark ‘ Wilman’
Quantity 200 (55# cases) — packed in tins and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- American Steel & Wire Co. v. BearseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
- Brigham v. HerrickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
3Cited by2 opinions
- Catlett v. HawthorneSupreme Court of Virginia · 1931
- Hanavan v. VrushoMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1985