Legal Opinion

State v. Nilsen

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided August 19, 1982No. Nos. 1 CA-CR 5072, 1 CA-CR 5084PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KLEINSCHMIDT, Judge.

The appellants, John and Anita Nilsen, appeal from their convictions on Counts Three and Four of the Indictment: attempted theft, class five and class four felonies respectively.

The appellants, husband and wife, were the owners of a pool hall in Scottsdale, Arizona, which John Nilsen operated, known as the House of Carom Acting through an undercover agent, officers of the Department of Public Safety and the Scottsdale Police Department negotiated with the Nilsens and in a series of incidents sold them property which the Nilsens were led to believe was stolen. The…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. United States v. Francis William GroesselCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  3. Charles T. Henderson, Jr., George Truitt Robbins and John B. Dees v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
  4. State v. McKinneyArizona Supreme Court · 1972
  5. United States v. Dale H. PrairieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. KinkadeArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State v. RisnerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API