Legal Opinion · Dissent

Gray v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)

Decided March 17, 2004No. 10-02-00176-CRPublished

1DissentTom Gray, Chief Justice

The common issue I address in these appeals is whether, having determined we have no jurisdiction to review any issue raised, we affirm the judgment or dismiss the appeal. We have not reviewed any aspect of the trial courts’ judgments, so, the proper judgment of this Court for each case is to dismiss the appeal. Because the Court affirms the judgments without reviewing them, I respectfully dissent.

The Court has decided we have no jurisdiction over the issues raised by Gray and Emich. The aspect of these appeals that has caused me to dissent is, having no jurisdiction over any issue for…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Phynes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  2. Olowosuko v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  3. Holloway v. Fifth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Eaden v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1995
  5. Kendall v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API