Legal Opinion

Pope v. Penrod Drilling Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 23, 1989No. W89-572PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WRIT GRANTED AND MADE PEREMPTORY:

The trial court erred in denying relator’s request for a jury trial. La.Code Civ.Proc. art. 1732(6) only affects suits that have been filed after the amendment’s effective date. Cambridge Corner Corp. v. Menard, 525 So.2d 527 (La.1988); Marks v. Petroleum Helicopters, Inc., an unreported decision bearing Number W89-447 on the Docket of the Court rendered on May 1, 1989. Since C.C.P. art. 1732(6) was not effective until September 7, 1988 and since this suit was filed on May 21, 1986, relator is entitled to a jury trial.

IT IS ORDERED that the trial court’s…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cambridge Corner Corp. v. MenardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1988

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bergeron v. Main Iron Works, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1990
  2. AMBROUSE SUCCESSION v. AmbroseLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API