Legal Opinion
Chrystal v. . T. B.R.R. Co.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided April 7, 1891PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] On the 4th day of September, 1877, the plaintiff, then seventeen months old, while unattended on defendant's track at the Cary avenue crossing in Hoosick Falls, was so injured by a passing locomotive as to require the amputation of a leg, and a finger of the left hand.
On a former review (105 N.Y. 164) it was determined:
1. That this court could not interfere with the finding of the jury that the plaintiff's mother was free from negligence contributing to the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Chrystal v. . Troy Boston R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1887
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. NailSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Finn v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
- Foley v. New York Central & Huson River RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1894