Legal Opinion

Shea v. Leonis

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 15, 1938No. Civ. 11604PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.

Plaintiffs made a motion for summary judgment against defendant Boyle Avenue Investment Company under section 437c of the Code of Civil Procedure, which provides in part as follows:

“When an answer is filed ... if it is claimed that there is no defense to the action, on motion of the plaintiffs . . . supported by affidavit of any person or persons having knowledge of the facts, the answer may be stricken out and judgment may be entered, in the discretion of the court, unless the defendant, by affidavit or affidavits shall show such facts as may be deemed by the judge hearing the motion…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bradbury v. HigginsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Eagle Oil & Refining Co. v. PrenticeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Walsh v. WalshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Banco De Espana v. Federal Reserve Bank of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
  4. Larsen v. JohannesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. Southern Pacific Co. v. FishCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API