Legal Opinion

McPeake v. Colley

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 15, 1967No. 42999PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Eberhardt, Judge.

Although appellant cites several federal cases holding that a plea in abatement is not a proper subject matter for summary judgment (Heyward v. Public Housing Administration, 238 F2d 689; Zeigler v. Akin, 261 F2d 88; Dredge Corp. v. Penny, 338 F2d 456; Danisch v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America, 151 FSupp. 17; and 6 Moore’s Federal Practice (2d Ed.) Par. 56.03, p. 2052), it appears that the defense of. former suit pending, as we have it, is not recognized in the federal courts, or in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For this reason we do not regard the federal cases as…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Singer v. ScottSupreme Court of Georgia · 1872

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Harbin Lumber Co. v. FowlerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  2. Dawson v. McCartCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
  3. Steele v. SteeleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
  4. Cherry v. GilbertCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
  5. Parsons, Brinckerhoff, Quade & Douglas, Inc. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API