Mariscal v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RILEY, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Defendant-Appellant Jose Mariscal appeals his conviction of voluntary manslaughter, a Class A felony. 1
We affirm.
ISSUES
Mariscal raises three issues, which we restate as:
1. Whether the trial court erred in allowing a witness to give an opinion about the confrontation between Mariscal and his victim.
2. Whether the State presented sufficient evidence to rebut Mariseal’s self-defense claim. ■
3. Whether Mariscal was prejudiced by the manner in which the trial court provided an interpreter for him.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On the evening of December 9,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Harrison v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
- Martinez Chavez v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1989
- Marshall v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
- Kent v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
- Lilly v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Hollowell v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- Meyer v. Marine Builders, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2003
- Cansler v. MillsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
- Howard Piltch v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- Linton v. DavisIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.