Legal Opinion
People v. Dunbar
New York Court of Appeals
Decided October 28, 2014PublishedCited by 73 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Read, J.
Beginning in 2007, the Queens County District Attorney implemented a central booking prearraignment interview program, launched in conjunction with the initiative to videotape interrogations. The program consisted of a structured, videotaped interview conducted by two members of the District Attorney’s staff (an assistant district attorney and a detective investigator [DI]) with a suspect immediately prior to arraignment. During this interview, the DI delivered a scripted preface or “preamble” to the Miranda warnings that, among other things, informed the suspect…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Dickerson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Missouri v. SeibertSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Duckworth v. EaganSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- California v. PrysockSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by73 opinions
- The People v. Jin Cheng LinNew York Court of Appeals · 2016
- People v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- People v. SpositoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- People v. KellyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- People v. BoxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.