Legal Opinion

Edmundo Rodriguez-Romero v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 25, 1970No. 23880PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

Following his state conviction on a charge of trafficking in marihuana, Edmundo Rodriguez-Romero (appellant) was ordered deported pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1251(a) (11), a statute which requires the deportation of such an alien. His appeal to the Board of Immigration Appeals was dismissed, and he then filed a petition in the United States District Court for the writ of habeas corpus. He asserted two grounds for relief: that he was and is a United States citizen and could not be deported and that, even if he were an alien, his deportation would violate the due process and cruel and unusual…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Harisiades v. ShaughnessySupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Savorgnan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Toy Teung Kwong v. AchesonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1951

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Thadeus Drozd, A/K/A Adam Passoni v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  2. Runnett v. ShultzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  3. Runnett v. ShultzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  4. Rafael Antonio Brea-Garcia v. Immigration and Naturalization Service (By Its District Director at Newark, New Jersey)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
  5. Flores v. MeeseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API