Edmundo Rodriguez-Romero v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Per curiam
Following his state conviction on a charge of trafficking in marihuana, Edmundo Rodriguez-Romero (appellant) was ordered deported pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1251(a) (11), a statute which requires the deportation of such an alien. His appeal to the Board of Immigration Appeals was dismissed, and he then filed a petition in the United States District Court for the writ of habeas corpus. He asserted two grounds for relief: that he was and is a United States citizen and could not be deported and that, even if he were an alien, his deportation would violate the due process and cruel and unusual…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Harisiades v. ShaughnessySupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Savorgnan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Toy Teung Kwong v. AchesonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1951
3Cited by9 opinions
- Thadeus Drozd, A/K/A Adam Passoni v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Runnett v. ShultzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Runnett v. ShultzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Rafael Antonio Brea-Garcia v. Immigration and Naturalization Service (By Its District Director at Newark, New Jersey)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Flores v. MeeseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.