Legal Opinion

Pike v. Heil Company

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided May 4, 1988No. Civ. 6181PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The employee filed a complaint alleging that he had been injured within the line and scope of his employment and demanding judgment against the employer for the compensation benefits and medical expenses to which he was entitled under the workmen's compensation statutes. In its answer, the employer admitted that the employee had been injured in January 1985 while working within the line and scope of his employment and that it had received prompt notification of the injury.

The employer further stated that it had paid two weeks of temporary total disability benefits and medical expenses,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lowe v. WaltersCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1986
  2. Benefield v. Goodwill Industries of MobileCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1985

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hammons v. Roses Stores, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1989
  2. Price's Bar-B-Que v. CarterCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1989
  3. GC COLYER & CO., INC. v. McAdamsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1990
  4. Drummond Co., Inc. v. WilsonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API