Legal Opinion
Lee v. State of Or.
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided August 3, 1995No. Civ. 94-6467-HOPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOGAN, Chief Judge.
The court must decide the status of parties to assert or defend claims in this action. Plaintiffs are two physicians, four terminally 111 or potentially terminally ill patients, a residential care facility, and individual operators of residential care facilities. Defendants include the state of Oregon, the Attorney General for the State of Oregon, a district attorney, members of the Oregon Board of Medical Examiners, Oregon Health Sciences University Hospital (OHSU), and members of the Oregon State Board of Higher Education (collectively state defendants). In…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lee v. OregonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Lee v. OregonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Hamilton v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 1997