Stryker v. J. A. Crane & Co.
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error to the district court for Butler county. Tried below before Post, J. cited, as to the tenth instruction: McPherson v. Wiswell, 19 Neb., 117; Caldwell v. Bridal, 48 la., 15. As to the thirteenth instruction : Little v. Woodworth, 8 Neb., 284; Smith v. Justice, 13 Wis., 671; Hahn v. Doolittle, 18 Id., 208; Fiskv.
Read the full summary
Error to the district court for Butler county. Tried below before Post, J. cited, as to the tenth instruction: McPherson v. Wiswell, 19 Neb., 117; Caldwell v. Bridal, 48 la., 15. As to the thirteenth instruction : Little v. Woodworth, 8 Neb., 284; Smith v. Justice, 13 Wis., 671; Hahn v. Doolittle, 18 Id., 208; Fiskv. Tank, 12 Id., 276, and notes; Henshaw v. Robins, 9 Met. [Mass.], 83; Randall v. Thornton, 43 Me., 226; Lamme v. Cregg, 1 Met. [Ky.], 446; Warren v. Van Pelt, 4 E. D. Smith [N. Y.], 205; Blakeman v. Mackay, 1 Hilton [N. Y.], 266; 1 Parsons, Conts. [5th Ed.], 579; Jack v. II. Co.,…
1Opinion of the Court
Cobb, Ch. J.
On December 1, 1887, the plaintiffs in the court below alleged that the defendant was indebted to them in $187.50, on account of forty-four hogs sold to him on September 10, 1887, no part of which was paid, and all of which was then due with interest.
The defendant answered, admitting the purchase of the hogs and that he had not paid for them, and setting up that at the time of the sale the hogs were infected with a *692contagious or infectious disease, and had recently been exposed to such'disease, which was known to the plaintiffs; that they sold the hogs to the defendant without…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Vincent v. LelandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kaster v. WoodsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
- Glover v. HolmanCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1927
- Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports1998
- Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1998