Legal Opinion

Clatsop County v. Oregon American Lumber Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 1937PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.

The question here presented is, whether a property owner, after pursuing the statutory method of petitioning the board of equalization for a reduction in valuation of his property and successively appealing, first, from the order of the board of equalization to the State Tax Commission, and, then from the order of the commission to the circuit court, where the matter is pending when suit is instituted to foreclose delinquent tax certificates, may interpose the defense of fraudulent overvaluation in such suit.

Such defense was alleged in appealing defendant’s answer; a demurrer was interposed…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State Board of Equalization v. People ex rel. GogginIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  2. State v. Ju NunOregon Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Burton Stock Car Co. v. TraegerIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
  4. County of Otter Tail v. BatchelderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  5. First National Bank v. HolmesIllinois Supreme Court · 1910

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Appeal of KliksOregon Supreme Court · 1937
  2. J. R. Widmer, Inc. v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  3. State Ex Rel. English v. Multnomah CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  4. M & M Woodworking Co. v. State Tax CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  5. M & M Woodworking Co. v. State Tax CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API