Markus v. Poulson
South Dakota Supreme Court
Appeal from Circuit Court, Codington, County. HoN. Carl G. Sherwood, Judge. Action by Henry W. Markus against Mabel C. Poulson, for specific performance of a contract of sale of realty. Prom a judgment for plaintiff, -and from an ¡order denying ¡a new trial, defendant appeals.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Circuit Court, Codington, County. HoN. Carl G. Sherwood, Judge. Action by Henry W. Markus against Mabel C. Poulson, for specific performance of a contract of sale of realty. Prom a judgment for plaintiff, -and from an ¡order denying ¡a new trial, defendant appeals. (1) To> point o-ne of the opinion, Respondent cited1: Inlagen v. Gary, (S. D.) 147 N. W. 965. (2) To point two of the opinion, Respondent cited: Gilfillan v. Sohaller, 144 N. W. 133, (S. D.) ; Malloy v. C. M. 6- St. P. Ry. Co., 148 N. W. 598 (S. D.)
1Opinion of the CourtWhiting, J.
Plaintiff sought ithe specific performance of a contract wherein the defendant had contracted to convey to him certain real property. Findings and judgment were for plaintiff, and this appeal is from such judgment and from an order denying a new trial.
[1] Appellant assigns as error -certain alleged rulings of the -trial count. Pier brief -contains -a purported statement of the case. In such statement there appears no- record of the rulings -complained of, and the assignments based upon such, alleged rulings require no further consideration. Brewster v. Miller, 31 S. D. 613, 141 N. W. 778;…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Inlagen v. Town of GarySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
- Brewster v. MillerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
3Cited by3 opinions
- Peterson v. MenkeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
- Barr v. Barnes County Board of County CommissionersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
- Barr v. Barnes County Board of County CommissionersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972