Legal Opinion

Connor v. Zelaski

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided June 18, 1992No. 92CA0074PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge PLANK.

Lillian M. Connor seeks review of the final order of the Industrial Claim Appeals Panel which ruled that she was a part-time domestic worker excluded from the Workers’ Compensation Act under § 8-40-302(4), C.R.S. (1991 Cum.Supp.). We affirm.

The facts are undisputed. Connor was employed by David and Kathy Zelaski to care for their three children at the Zelaski’s home. Her.duties did not include housework. Connor worked fewer than forty hours per week on three or four days a week. She sought workers’ compensation benefits for injuries allegedly sustained in that work, but…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Triad Painting Co. v. BlairSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  2. Evans v. WebsterColorado Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Weatherford v. ArterWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Younger v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  5. Crush v. KaelinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1967

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Naiden v. EppsColorado Court of Appeals · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API