Legal Opinion
Froelich v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided October 26, 1993No. A93A1396PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McMurray, Presiding Judge.
On February 23, 1993, Jerome J. Froelich, Jr., Fred Tokars, Tim Huhn, Andy Pennington and Kirk Walsh (petitioners) filed a motion to quash subpoenas directing Huhn, Pennington and Walsh to appear before the Cobb County Grand Jury. Petitioners alleged that Tokars is a suspect in a police investigation; that Froelich is Tokars’ attorney; that Froelich hired Huhn, Pennington and Walsh to conduct an investigation on behalf of Tokars and that subpoenas issued for Huhn, Pennington and Walsh to appear before the grand jury for the improper purpose of uncovering information…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Patterson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
- R. W. Page Corp. v. LumpkinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
- Chastain v. BakerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1986
- Citizens for Ethical Government, Inc. v. Gwinnett Place Associates, L.P.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1990
- Cheeks v. MillerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In the Interest of I. B.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
- Anthem Casualty Insurance v. MurrayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
- Kappers v. DeKalb County Board of HealthCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
- Kitchen v. INSURAMERICA CORP.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
- Thompson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.