Legal Opinion

State v. Haugen

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1986No. Crim. 1122PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Justice.

Craig Haugen appealed from the judgment of conviction for driving while under the influence of alcohol. Haugen argues that he did not make a knowing and intelligent waiver of his right to trial by jury, that he was not informed of his right to compulsory process, and that he was denied his right to effective assistance of counsel. We reverse and remand for a new trial.

On July 16, 1984, Haugen appeared before the county court of Ward County for arraignment on the charge of driving while under the influence of alcohol, second offense. The prosecutor in his affidavit states…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. State v. KranzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. GrunewaldCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  4. Illingworth v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. PitmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. WilsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. LambNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. HeggNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State v. BohnNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API