Legal Opinion

Merkel v. Merkel

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided November 21, 1916PublishedCited by 2 opinions

On bill, &e.

1Opinion of the Court

Grieein, V. C.

The bill-in this cause is filed (1) to set aside a compromise agreement which resulted in the settlement of a suit at law; (2) to compel the return of moneys paid thereunder, and (3) to restrain the disposal of the notes given under the agreement.

It seems that John G-. Merkel in his lifetime was the holder of two hundred and forty^eight shares of the capital stock of the John G-. Merkel Companjq with a capital issued of two hundred and fifty shares; he practically owned the corporation, the other two shares being held-by the present complainant and one Julia Voight to qualify…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hattersley v. BissettSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1893
  2. Lubowicki v. Travelers InsuranceUnited States District Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API