Legal Opinion

Wilson Gorrell v. Warden

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided September 24, 2013No. 12-13322UnpublishedCited by 15 opinions

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Per curiam

Wilson Gorrell, a pro se prisoner, appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition for habeas relief. According to Mr. Gorrell, the Federal Bureau of Prisons violated his due process rights when it disciplined him following a positive drug test, and unlawfully discriminated against him during his disciplinary proceedings because he is HIV-positive. On appeal, he claims that the district court erroneously (1) concluded that his discrimination-based claims were inappropriately raised in a § 2241 petition; (2) concluded that the BOP satisfied its procedural due process…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Willie Clisby, Cross-Appellant v. Charlie Jones, Warden, Holman Unit, Alabama Department of Corrections, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
  4. Kirby v. SiegelmanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
  5. Antonelli v. Warden, U.S.P. AtlantaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. United States v. Rosaire DubruleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
  2. Andre Taylor v. Warden, FCI JesupDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2026
  3. Brito Matom v. ICE / U.S. Immigration and Customs EnforcementDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2025
  4. Elijah Mustafa Veney v. Warden H.L. RayDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2026
  5. JOHNSON v. WARDEN FCI TALLAHASSEEDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 2025

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API