Legal Opinion · Dissent

Attorney General v. A Book Named "Naked Lunch"

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided July 7, 1966Published

1DissentReabdon, J.

(dissenting) I respectfully dissent from the opinion of the majority. Some general observations are in order as a preface to a statement of my reasons.

1. It is appropriate to note that, since the adoption of the Constitution of Massachusetts in 1780, this court and its judges have been most aware of the responsibility laid upon them by art. 16, Part I, of the Declaration of Rights which provides: “The liberty of the press is essential to the security of freedom in a state: it ought not, therefore, to be restrained in this commonwealth.” It was Massachusetts which, in ratifying the…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Rosenblatt v. BaerSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. A Book Named "John Cleland's Memoirs of a Woman of Pleasure" v. Attorney General of MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Blair v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1937

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API