Legal Opinion

Bakos v. City of Olmsted Falls

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 19, 2003No. 02-3399PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*153OPINION

COLE, Circuit Judge.

In this interlocutory appeal, Individual Defendants-Appellants Thomas C. Jones, Richard W. Krusinski, Thomas Caine, and Daniel R. Gilíes appeal the denial of their motion for summary judgment on their qualified immunity defense in this action alleging that Defendants violated 42 U.S.C. § 1988 by infringing Plaintiffs’ rights under the Fourth and First Amendments. For the reasons discussed herein, we REVERSE the district court’s denial of qualified immunity on the Fourth Amendment claim and AFFIRM the denial of summary judgment on the First Amendment claim.

I.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. United States v. SokolowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Johnson v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Michigan v. DeFillippoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Miller v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
  2. LeFever v. FergusonDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2013
  3. Stanley v. City of NortonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API