Legal Opinion

Roy v. Notestine

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 23, 1950No. 4-9052PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Minor W. Millwee, Justice.

Appellant, M. A. Roy, is engaged in business at Memphis, Tennessee, as Roy Butcher Supply Company. In April, 1946, appellant entered into a conditional sales contract with appellee, Thomas W. Notestine, who was in the process of opening a frozen food plant at Forrest City, Arkansas.

The original contract provided for the sale by appellant to Notestine of over $10,000 worth of refrigeration equipment to be used in the proposed plant. By agreement there were subsequent omissions and substitutions of certain items called for in the original contract, resulting in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Belding v. WhittingtonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
  2. Butler v. DodsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
  3. Loden v. Paris Auto Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  4. Olson v. Moody, Knight & Lewis, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
  5. Fox v. Arkansas Industrial Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1889

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bigger v. GlassSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956
  2. Fred E. Cooper, Inc. v. FarrLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. Eckels v. Arkansas Real Estate CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1990
  4. Safety Motors, Inc. v. Elk Horn Bank & Trust Co.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1954
  5. Miller v. Empire Rice Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API