Legal Opinion
Federal Insurance Co. v. Spooner
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided November 28, 1962No. 39823PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Frankum, Judge.
1. The first question for consideration is whether the evidence authorized the award. The employer and insurer rely upon cases exemplified by Phinese v. Ocean Acc. &c. Corp., 81 Ga. App. 394 (58 SE2d 921), and Travelers Ins. Co. v. Boyer, 102 Ga. App. 248 (116 SE2d 6), to support the contention that the award finding a change in condition was not authorized inasmuch as the only physician who testified at the hearing had not examined the claimant prior to, or at the time of the prior hearings. Where the sole evidence tending to show a change in condition is the testimony of a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Employers Liability Assurance Corp. v. HollifieldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
- Phinese v. Ocean Accident & Guaranty Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
- Travelers Insurance Co. v. BoyerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
- American Mutual Liability Insurance v. GrimesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. O'ByrneCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hercules, Inc. v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Baggett Transportation Co. v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Cameron v. American Can Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. DuttonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
- Chattahoochee Camp School v. ColeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.