Legal Opinion · Concurrence
Pizzato v. Alabama Educational Television Commission
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided September 27, 2013No. 1111494Published
1ConcurrenceMurdock, Justice
(concurring specially, as substituted on denial of application for rehearing on January 24, 2013).
I have struggled mightily to reason my way past the redressability barrier cited in the main opinion. Having failed in that endeavor, I am compelled to concur.
The redressability barrier before us is, as the main opinion indicates, the same redressability barrier that has been referred to by the United States Supreme Court as part of “the irreducible constitutional minimum of standing”:
“The ‘irreducible constitutional minimum of standing contains three requirements. Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.