Cummings v. State

HARWOOD, Judge.

This appellant has been convicted for the possession of a 'Still to be used for the purpose of manufacturing prohibited beverages.

The evidence presented by the State was, 'in óur opinion, ample in its tendencies to support the verdict of guilty.

Appellant’s able counsel argues only one point in his brief as constituting error. After study of this record we are convinced that the point so argued constitutes the only substantial question therein, and that otherwise this record 'is free of error probably injurious to the substantial rights of this appellant.

The proposition asserted…