Legal Opinion
United States v. Village of New Hempstead, NY
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 27, 1993No. 92 CV 2592 (KMW)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KIMBA M. WOOD, District Judge.
The United States and defendant Rockland Community Action Council, Inc. (“ROCAC”) move respectively for summary judgment and partial summary judgment in this action arising from ROCAC’s attempt to comply with its lease to settle homeless families on unutilized property belonging to the United States Department of the Army (“the Army”). The Army leased the property to ROCAC pursuant to the Stewart B. McKinney Homeless Assistance Act of 1987 (“the McKinney Act,” or “the Act”), 42 U.S.C. § 11411, et seq., which requires federal agencies…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. ShimerSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- City of New York v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Hutton v. KlabalDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Sky Four Realty Co. v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1987
3Cited by1 opinion
- Iowa Coal Mining Co. v. Monroe CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1996