Legal Opinion · Concurrence

People v. Solomon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 10, 1944Published

1ConcurrenceUntermyer, J.

I concur in the reversal of the judgment of conviction and the dismissal of the information against the defendant Silinsky on the ground that the crimes charged are not sustained by any evidence.

As to the defendant Solomon I concur in the reversal of the judgment and the dismissal of the second count contained in the information upon the ground that the charge of maintaining a room for the purpose of gambling is not sustained by any competent proof. I am of opinion, however, that the first count of the information should also be dismissed upon the ground that the evidence does not disclose…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Wiener v. BarrAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
  2. People Ex Rel. Wiener v. BarrNew York Court of Appeals · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API