Legal Opinion

Brush Beryllium Company v. Marinthia Meckley, No. 14128

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 6, 1960No. 797PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal by the defendant from an order of the United States District Court denying defendant’s motion for summary judgment, but allowing immediate appeal for the reason that there is substantial ground for a difference of' opinion on a controlling question of law, it being considered by the district judge that an immediate appeal from the order might materially advance the ultimate determination of the case.

The crucial issue is whether or not the two-year Ohio statute of limitations-[Section 2305.10, Rev.Code of Ohio] bars an action for damages caused by…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. West v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. City of Miami v. BrooksSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
  5. United States v. Wilroy ReidCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Brush Beryllium Company v. Marinthia MeckleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API