Legal Opinion

Neeley v. Duckworth

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided July 12, 1979No. S 79-50PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ALLEN SHARP, District Judge.

This Court now considers the petitioner’s Motion for Issuance of a Writ of Habeas Corpus filed pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner, Thomas Lee Neeley, makes two allegations in his motion, one of which raises an issue not yet conclusively determined in this Circuit. Petitioner first alleges that his guilty plea was not voluntarily made because- the state trial judge did not follow the prosecutor’s recommendation of sentence. Secondly, petitioner contends his guilty plea was defective because the trial court did not advise him…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Holler v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1980
  2. Walker v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Kirk v. DuckworthDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1989
  4. State v. WileyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
  5. Cates v. Superintendent, Indiana Youth CenterDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API