Legal Opinion

A.M. v. City of Indianola

District Court, N.D. Mississippi

Decided July 30, 2025No. 4:25-cv-00053Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI GREENVILLE DIVISION A.M. by and through next friend, NAKALA MURRY, and NAKALA MURRY PLAINTIFFS v. CIVIL ACTION NO.: 4:25-cv-53-DMB-DAS CITY OF INDIANOLA, MISSISSIPPI; and OFFICER GREG CAPERS DEFENDANTS AGREED ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION TO RESTRICT ACCESS TO DOCS 13-12 AND 13-13 THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Unopposed Motion to Restrict Access to Docs 13-12 and 13-13, pursuant to L. U. Civ. R. 79. No party opposes the sealing of the documents at issue. The Court, having considered the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Globe Newspaper Co. v. Superior Court, County of NorfolkSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Gary Van Waeyenberghe and Carl Leibowitz, and Howard K. SchwartzCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
  4. United States v. Holy Land Foundation for Relief & DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
  5. Shandell Bradley v. Louis AckalCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API