Legal Opinion
National Advertising Co. v. Town of Babylon
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided January 4, 1989No. CV 88-0105PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WEXLER, District Judge.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff National Advertising Company (“National”), a subsidiary of Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company (“3M”), a Delaware corporation, brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the Town of Babylon (“Babylon”), the Village of Freeport (“Freeport”), the Town of Hempstead (“Hempstead”), the Town of Islip (“Islip”), the Village of Lindenhurst (“Lindenhurst”), and the Town of Oyster Bay (“Oyster Bay”) 1 claiming that various sign ordinances of the defendant towns and villages violate plaintiffs right to free speech under the First and…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Craig v. BorenSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- LAMAR ADVERTISING OF PENN, LLC, — CROSS-APPELLEE v. TOWN OF ORCHARD PARK, NEW YORK, —Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- National Advertising Co. v. Town of BabylonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Advantage Media, L.L.C. v. City of HopkinsDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2005
- Goward v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
- Abel v. Town of OrangetownDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.