Legal Opinion

Fogle v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 25, 2003No. ED 81052PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARY R. RUSSELL, Presiding Judge.

Harold Fogle (“Movant”) appeals from a judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Charles County denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Movant alleges: (1) that the motion court clearly erred in finding there was a factual basis to support his guilty plea on the charge of stealing by deceit, (2) that the motion court lacked jurisdiction to convict Movant of stealing by deceit as there was no factual basis to support that charge, and (3) that Movant’s plea counsel was ineffective for failing to object to the absence…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. TroupeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1995
  2. Robinson v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  3. Vangunda v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Nichols v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. Crawley v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Echols v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Harvey v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. State v. CrumpMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API