Legal Opinion

IMPERIAL OUTFITTERS TO LARGE MEN, INC. v. Genesco, Inc.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 10, 1986PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), judgment appealed from and order of the Appellate Division brought up for review affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (95 AD2d 755). We add that defendant Genesco’s claim that defendant 48-48 Associates, Inc. is collaterally estopped from litigating the proper interpretation of the lease language in this cross claim because of the judicial interpretation previously made in plaintiffs action is without merit since…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Schwartz v. Public AdministratorNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. Imperial Outfitters to Large Men, Inc. v. Genesco, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. 85th Street Restaurant Corp. v. SandersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. Alvarez v. Attack Asbestos, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  3. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. Power AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API