Legal Opinion

Boggs v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided March 11, 1927PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion, of the Court by

Judge Dietzman

Affirming.

Under an indictment charging him with the offense of unlawfully possessing intoxicating liquor, the appel-' lant was found guilty and has appealed.

The commonwealth introduced on the trial only two witnesses, William Fitzgerald and Allen Diamond. They testified, in substance, that they were at the passenger depot and observed John Wellman, Cud Wellman and George Atkins going by in an automobile. Being of the opinion that they would discover something of interest if they followed these men, these witnesses did follow them out of town and up a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Baker v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
  2. Cooley v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
  3. Rickman v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fox v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  2. Yarbrough v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
  3. Wellman v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
  4. McKenzie v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API