Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Payne

District Court, E.D. Arkansas

Decided January 18, 2022No. 3:20-cv-00391Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION BRUNSON ROBERTS PLAINTIFF ADC #127841 NO. 3:20-cv-00391-KGB-ERE DEXTER PAYNE, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER Defendants have filed a motion to dismiss this lawsuit, explaining that Plaintiff Brunson Roberts has not provided discovery responses, failed to timely propound discovery on Defendants, and has refused to participate in his scheduled deposition on December 20, 2021.1 Doc. 82. Mr. Roberts filed this lawsuit pro se under

42 U.S.C. § 1983

and is proceeding with retaliation and corrective-inaction claims.2 In the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Aziz v. WrightCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
  2. Raymond Setzke v. Steve WhitmillCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
  3. George Poole v. Gene StubblefieldCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API