Legal Opinion

Dixon v. Csx Intermodal Terminals, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 23, 2015No. A15A1586Published

1Opinion of the Court

Doyle, Chief Judge.

Earnest Dixon sued CSX Intermodal Terminals, Inc. (“CSXIT”), seeking to recover damages under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (“the FELA”) for injuries he suffered when he fell from a railcar while unloading it. The trial court granted summary judgment to CSXIT, finding that Dixon could not recover because CSXIT was not a common carrier under the FELA. Dixon appeals that ruling, and we affirm for the reasons that follow.

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. A de novo…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wells Fargo & Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Edwards v. Pacific Fruit Express Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Smith v. Rail Link, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
  4. Hall v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  5. Goss v. Alabama Great Southern RailroadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API