Legal Opinion

Hurley v. Rose

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 28, 1932PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTownley, J.

In these actions the parties are the same. The plaintiff, however, is suing as an assignee. His two separate claims are derived from different parties and do not grow out of the same transaction. In one action plaintiff is the assignee of the Van Ness Lumber Company and sues to recover for building supplies and money loaned the defendants. The action was commenced in December, 1931, and the cause was noticed for trial for the February, 1932, term. In the second action, which was commenced in February, 1932, plaintiff is suing as assignee of one Grassi for work, labor and services furnished…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Peck v. PeckIllinois Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Consolidated Dairy Products Co. v. Loft, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Hurley v. RoseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API