Legal Opinion · Dissent

Maletic v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 26, 2003Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION BY

Judge FRIEDMAN.

The Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County (trial court) sustained Karen L. Maletic’s (Licensee) appeal from the suspension of her operator’s license based on the finding that Licensee was not under arrest at the time she refused to submit to a blood test.1 Unlike the majority, I do not believe the trial court abused its discretion in so finding; therefore, I respectfully dissent.

The issue of whether a licensee has been placed under arrest for purposes of section 1547 of the Vehicle Code, 75 Pa.C.S. § 1547, is one of fact. Pappas v. Department of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Banner v. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Commonwealth v. DanforthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Pappas v. Commonwealth, Department of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP. v. MalizioCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Commonwealth v. UebelackerCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API