Legal Opinion

People v. Glassman

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1895No. 584PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District Hon. H. W. Smith, Judge. William Glassman, editor of the Ogden Standard and the Standard Publishing Company, a corporation, were ■convicted of criminal libel, and appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

BaRTCH, J.:

The defendants were indicted for libel, convicted, and sentenced each to pay a fine in the sum of $500, and the defendant Glassman, in default of payment of fine, to be imprisoned until the same was paid. A motion for a new trial was overruled, and thereupon an appeal was prosecuted to this court, and many errors assigned. The indictment, among other things, charges that the defendant *240Glassman was the editor of a certain newspaper called the-Standard, and that the defendant the publishing company was the owner of the said newspaper; that on the 30th day of October, 1894, the said…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. White v. NichollsSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
  2. Johnson v. BrownWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Commonwealth v. ClapMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1808
  4. Wilson v. FitchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
  5. Belknap v. BallMichigan Supreme Court · 1890

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Williams v. Standard-Examiner Pub. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Utah State Farm Bureau Federation v. National Farmers Union Service Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
  3. Tucker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API