Legal Opinion

Peck v. Thomas

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 19, 2012No. Nos. 11-35283, 11-35296, 11-35355PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The opinion filed on June 19, 2012, slip op. 7097 and available at 682 F.3d 1201 (2012), is amended as follows:

1. At slip op. 7109 [682 F.3d at 1208], the following sentence should be changed from “But the BOP’s unsuccessful attempts to enact the regulation at issue do not demonstrate willful noncompliance with statutory mandates, and no court has ever found this to be case.” to “But the BOP’s unsuccessful attempts to enact the regulation at issue do not demonstrate willful noncompliance with statutory mandates, and no court has ever found this to be the case.”

2. At slip op. 7109 [682…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Lopez v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. McLean v. CrabtreeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  4. Paul N. Bowen v. Robert A. Hood, 1 Warden, Fci, SheridanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. Arrington v. DanielsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Los Coyotes Band of Cahuilla & Cupeño Indians v. JewellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  2. Altera Corp. v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2015
  3. Safari Club International v. Debra HaalandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
  4. Abbott v. Federal Bureau of PrisonsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  5. Andrew Gray v. Marion FeatherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API