Sponenburg v. City of Gloversville
New York Supreme Court
Motions by defendant in this and twenty-one other similar actions for orders suspending the operation of injunctions restraining the defendant from sewering into the Oayadutta creek.
1Opinion of the CourtSpencer, J.
The defendant makes twenty-two separate applications for orders suspending the operation of injunctive judgment provisions restraining the defendant from sewering' into the Oayadutta creek. Similar applications were made a year ago and the orders then granting the relief have received the attention of the Appellate Division of this, court; and while that division has, to some extent, criticised *291the action then taken, I do not understand that it intended to-hold that the burden was upon the defendant to establish its good faith, but that it simply expressed its opinion that from all the papers…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hadcock v. City of GloversvilleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
- Sponenburg v. City of GloversvilleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904