Hommel v. Benshoff
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Robert Roberto, Jr., J.
*1039The motion by defendant Ronald Benshoff for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and cross motion by third-party defendant Wackenhut Security Corp. for summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaint are decided as follows:
Plaintiff is employed by third-party defendant Wackenhut Security Corp. (hereinafter Wackenhut) as a “horse identifier”, a job whose apparent purpose is to insure that a racehorse that runs a race is in fact the one listed on the program. This is accomplished by examining the “night eyes”, a distinctive marking/tattoo…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Morgan v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
- Turcotte v. FellNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Maddox v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Cohen v. Heritage Motor Tours, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Comeau v. WrayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Becker v. Pleasant Valley Farms, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Wheeler v. CouretDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Vendrella v. Astriab Family Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2014