Legal Opinion

Harkey v. Neville

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 11, 1904PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Before DanTzpEr, J., Oconee, February, 1904. Action by Wm. C. Harvey, Thos. R. Colston, Miles Oswald Colston and Harry Edgar Colston against Rouisa W. Neville and J. D. McMahon. From Circuit decree, ■ plaintiffs appeal. cite: Estate of Louisa W. is not a fee conditional: Code, 1902, 2464; 10 S. C., 365; 16 S. C., 316; 23 S. C., 47; 2 Hill, 198; 4 Kent., 284; 1 McC., 79; Bail. Eq., 298; 3 Rich. Eq., 578; 1 Hill Ch., 282; 2 Hill Ch., 199; 4 Rich.

Read the full summary

Before DanTzpEr, J., Oconee, February, 1904. Action by Wm. C. Harvey, Thos. R. Colston, Miles Oswald Colston and Harry Edgar Colston against Rouisa W. Neville and J. D. McMahon. From Circuit decree, ■ plaintiffs appeal. cite: Estate of Louisa W. is not a fee conditional: Code, 1902, 2464; 10 S. C., 365; 16 S. C., 316; 23 S. C., 47; 2 Hill, 198; 4 Kent., 284; 1 McC., 79; Bail. Eq., 298; 3 Rich. Eq., 578; 1 Hill Ch., 282; 2 Hill Ch., 199; 4 Rich. Eq., 423; 1 Jarman on Wills, 65; 1 Russell, 262; 7 Rich. Eq., 358; 67 S. C., 307; 48 S- C., 440; 1 Jarman on Wills, 6th Am. ed., 553; 2 Id., 460; 7…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. ChiEE Justice Pope.

Louisa M. Neville, claiming to be the owner in fee simple of a tract of land containing 226 acres, situate in the County of Oconee, in the State of South Carolina, contracted with and sold to her codefendant, J. D. McMahon, all the pine timber trees standing on said tract of land, for twenty cents a cord, for her own use, benefit and behalf, and that the said defendant, J. D. McMahon, has proceeded with a force of hands to fell some thirty or forty cords of said pine timber trees standing on said lands, under the contract with…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Monk v. GeddesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API