Legal Opinion

Golden Rule v. Hartwell

District Court, D. New Hampshire

Decided July 17, 1995No. CV-94-332-MPublished

1Opinion of the Court

Golden Rule v . Hartwell CV-94-332-M 07/17/95 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Golden Rule Insurance Company, Plaintiff, v. Civil N o . 94-332-M Wesley H . Hartwell, Individually and As Executor and/or Administrator of the Estate of Patricia Ann Hartwell, Defendant. O R D E R Golden Rule Insurance Company filed this action under

28 U.S.C. §2201

seeking a declaration that it has no duty to reimburse defendant, Wesley Hartwell, for medical expenses incurred by his late wife, Patricia Hartwell. Jurisdiction is based upon diversity of citizenship and an amount in…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Samuel Mesnick v. General Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
  2. Edmund Mann and Beverly Mann v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
  3. Chemical Waste Management, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
  4. Edgar M. Skinner, Esther Skinner v. Aetna Life and CasualtyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
  5. American Franklin Life Insurance v. GalatiDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API