Carlos I. Nunez v. State of Indiana
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SHEPARD, Senior Judge.
[1] By both law and practice, American courts have long been especially concerned that criminal defendants not give up various rights by virtue of being misled or uninformed or threatened. Here, the question is whether a conviction must be set aside because the defendant who was asking to waive trial by jury did not tell the trial judge that his request was voluntary.
Facts and Procedural History
[2] In December 2012, the State charged appellant Carlos I. Nunez with rape as a class B felony. Ind. Code § 35-42-4-1 (1998). Nunez subsequently filed a verified waiver of jury…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCannSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States v. Michael Lee SammonsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Sanders v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Adam Horton v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2016
- Donato Luna-Quintero v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2019
- Matthew J. Gogarty v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2020
- Mohamed M. Dadouch v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2019