Fredenburgh-Metzger Realty Co. v. Leventhal
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Van Kirk, J.:
The charge of the court was fair and clear and no exceptions thereto were taken by appellant. The court and jury saw and heard the witnesses; they had every opportunity and means on which to determine the credibility of each. There was evidence justifying findings as follows: That Mrs. Cronk employed the plaintiff and gave it the exclusive right to sell this property; that plaintiff first brought the matter to the attention of the purchasers and was the means of bringing the seller and purchasers together," *249that the plaintiff was the procuring cause of the sale; that plaintiff…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lloyd v. . MatthewsNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Travis v. BowronAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
- Winslow v. DayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920