Legal Opinion
Goodknight v. Piraino
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided April 19, 1990No. 4-89-0412PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRESIDING JUSTICE KNECHT
delivered the opinion of the court:
The plaintiff, Terri Goodknight, filed a second-amended complaint, counts V through XI alleging common law negligence, wilful and wanton misconduct, and a violation of the Dramshop Act (Act) (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1987, ch. 43, par. 135) against the defendants, Village of Royal, and Royal Centennial, Inc., a nonprofit corporation, and special governmental negligence against the Village of Royal. Counts I through IV involved other defendants not party to this appeal. The trial court granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss counts V through…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Cunningham v. BrownIllinois Supreme Court · 1961
- Wimmer v. KoenigsederIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
- Swett v. Village of AlgonquinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
- Hopkins v. PowersIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
- Quinn v. Sigma Rho Chapter of Beta Theta Pi FraternityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Wakulich v. MrazIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
- Vesey v. Chicago Housing AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
- Charles v. SeigfriedIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
- Monson v. City of DanvilleIllinois Supreme Court · 2019
- Capitol Indemnity Corp. v. Stewart Smith Intermediaries, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.