Legal Opinion

Bowman v. Barnhart

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided August 16, 2002No. 01 C 8667PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

KEYS, United States Magistrate Judge.

The Plaintiff, Robert P. Bowman, moves the Court for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Defendant, Commissioner of Social Security (the “Commissioner”), has filed a cross-motion for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, Mr. Bowman’s motion is denied, and the Commissioner’s motion is granted.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Mr. Bowman has exhausted his administrative remedies with the Social Security Administration (the “SSA”) and asks the Court to declare unconstitutional, either…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Flemming v. NestorSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. United States Railroad Retirement Board v. FritzSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Schweiker v. Gray PanthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re Marriage of RobertsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API